Delete a 50 MB file and a credentials file in the last RUN of your Dockerfile — then read the credentials back out of the shipped image, and find the 50 MB still sitting on your disk. An image is a stack of immutable diffs; a container is one thin layer on top.
A Docker image is not a disk image. It's a stack of tarballs — one per build step — and the filesystem your container sees is a union mount that overlays them, topmost wins. Every layer is immutable and content-addressed, so unrelated images share the ones they have in common. A running container adds exactly one thin writable layer on top, which is why docker diff can tell you what changed and why two containers from the same image cost almost nothing extra.
This exercise makes all of that literal. You'll build an image whose last RUN deletes a 50 MB file and a credentials file — and then read that credentials file back out of the shipped image. You'll watch a two-byte append cost 4.6 MB. And you'll end up looking at the actual kernel overlay mount, with its six lowerdir= paths and a character device standing in for a deleted file.
Docker Engine docs, Storage drivers — sections Images and layers, Container and layers, Container size on disk, and Sharing promotes smaller images:
"When you create a new container, you add a new writable layer on top of the underlying layers. This layer is often called the 'container layer'."
"Shared image layers are only stored once in
/var/lib/docker/and are also shared when pushing and pulling an image to an image registry."On
docker ps -s: size is "the amount of data (on disk) that's used for the writable layer of each container"; virtual size is "the amount of data used for the read-only image data used by the container plus the container's writable layer 'size'."
Docker Engine docs, OverlayFS storage driver — sections How the overlay2 driver works and How container reads and writes work with overlay2. This is the sentence Parts 2, 4 and 5 exist to make you look at:
"When a file is deleted within a container, a whiteout file is created in the container (
upperdir). The version of the file in the image layer (lowerdir) is not deleted (because thelowerdiris read-only). However, the whiteout file prevents it from being available to the container."
And for copy-up, from the same page:
"The first time a container writes to an existing file, that file does not exist in the container (
upperdir). Theoverlay2driver performs acopy_upoperation to copy the file from the image (lowerdir) to the container (upperdir)."
The on-disk form of a whiteout is the kernel's, not Docker's — Linux kernel documentation, Overlay Filesystem, section whiteouts and opaque directories:
"A whiteout is created as a character device with 0/0 device number or as a zero-size regular file with the xattr
trusted.overlay.whiteout."
The tar form is the OCI's — OCI Image Layer Specification, section Whiteouts:
"A whiteout file is an empty file with a special filename that signifies a path should be deleted. A whiteout filename consists of the prefix
.wh.plus the basename of the path to be deleted."
Part 5's claim about the l/ symlink directory is from the overlay2 page's Image and container layers on-disk: the short identifiers exist "to avoid hitting the page size limitation on arguments to the mount command," and "the overlay2 driver natively supports up to 128 lower OverlayFS layers."
Four pieces of background, one line each on where they're load-bearing:
docker diff letters and every character device you find in Part 5. This one carries most of the exercise. Kernel: Overlay Filesystem (read "whiteouts and opaque directories" and "Non-directories").tar; the whiteout is an ordinary zero-byte member. OCI Image Layer Specification.6.12.76-linuxkit, 16 GiB allocated to the VMalpine:3.20 — Alpine 3.20.10, digest sha256:d9e853e87e55526f6b2917df91a2115c36dd7c696a35be12163d44e6e2a4b6bcStorage driver overlay2, builder buildkit.dockerfile.v0. Layer digests and overlay2 directory IDs are generated per build and per machine — yours will differ, and you'll substitute your own throughout Part 5.
Four terms carry the whole exercise:
| Term | What it actually is |
|---|---|
| Layer | A tar archive of the filesystem changes one build step made — files added or modified, plus tombstones for files removed. Immutable once written, and named by the SHA-256 of its contents (its diff ID), which is what makes sharing possible. |
| Union / overlay mount | The kernel stacking those layers into one directory tree. In overlay2's vocabulary: the read-only image layers are lowerdirs, the container's writable layer is the upperdir, and the combined view is the merged directory — which is what becomes the container's /. |
| Whiteout | How you delete a file you don't own. Since lower layers are read-only, an upper layer records a marker at that path — a character device with major/minor 0,0 on disk, or a .wh.<name> entry inside a layer tarball — and the union hides everything below it. |
| Copy-up | How you modify a file you don't own. On first write, overlayfs copies the entire file from the lower layer into the upper layer, then edits the copy. Costs are per-file, not per-byte-changed. |
RUN rm in its own step reduces your image size by zero and reduces the recoverability of your secret by zero.
The shape you're about to see on disk:
Deleting layer 3's file from layer 1 changes the top row. It does not change row 3.
One terminal is enough. You need Docker, and roughly 150 MB of free image space (the exercise ends up with four images). Everything here is tagged layers-demo:* and named layers-* so you can clean up precisely at the end.
Work in a scratch directory, not in a repo:
mkdir -p /tmp/layers && cd /tmp/layers
Create Dockerfile. Note that each RUN is deliberately its own step, and the last one is the "cleanup" line you've seen in a hundred real Dockerfiles:
FROM alpine:3.20
RUN echo "build-id=1" > /etc/app-release
RUN dd if=/dev/urandom of=/opt/build-cache.bin bs=1M count=50 2>/dev/null
RUN echo "AKIAEXAMPLESECRETKEY" > /root/.aws-credentials
RUN rm -f /opt/build-cache.bin /root/.aws-credentials
CMD ["sleep", "3600"]
/dev/urandom rather than zeros on purpose: incompressible bytes, so nothing downstream can quietly make the problem look smaller than it is.
RUN lines, and Steps 6 and 7 will pick an arbitrary one. Clear just this exercise's entries first — never a blanket prune, which takes everyone else's cache with it:
for pat in build-id build-cache aws-credentials app-release; do
docker buildx prune -a --force --filter "description~=$pat"
done
Run that loop twice: freeing a record can make its parent prunable, so the first pass usually leaves a few behind.
What this part tests: the claim that the image is a stack of per-step diffs, not a single blob. If that's true, docker history should show one row per instruction with a size attached, and those sizes should add up.
docker build -t layers-demo:leaky .
docker history layers-demo:leaky
FROM. How many rows will you get, and what size will the last RUN — the rm — report?Seven rows: your five plus the two the base image contributed — history is inherited, so you're reading alpine's own build steps at the bottom. CMD rows are 0B because they change metadata, not files. And the rm step is 0B too, which is the first hint of the whole lesson.
docker image inspect layers-demo:leaky --format '{{.Size}}'
docker image inspect alpine:3.20 --format '{{.Size}}'
The layer sizes are 8,822,697 + 11 + 52,428,800 + 21 + 0, which is 61,251,529 exactly. The image's size is the sum of its layers' diffs; there is nothing else in there.
docker run --rm layers-demo:leaky sh -c 'ls -la /opt; cat /root/.aws-credentials'
RUN deleted both files. From inside a container, is /opt/build-cache.bin there?Both gone, exactly as a filesystem should behave. The image is still 61 MB.
What this part tests: the mental model's headline — a whiteout hides, it doesn't remove. The union view above is honest; it just isn't the whole artifact. docker save gives you the artifact, exactly as a registry would receive it.
mkdir -p save && docker save layers-demo:leaky -o save/leaky.tar
cd save && tar -xf leaky.tar
for f in blobs/sha256/*; do
if tar -tf "$f" 2>/dev/null | grep -q 'aws-credentials'; then
echo "FOUND IN: $f"
tar -xOf "$f" root/.aws-credentials 2>/dev/null
fi
done
docker save writes the image exactly as it would be pushed to a registry. Can you get AKIAEXAMPLESECRETKEY out of it?Two layers matched the name; only one has the file, and the loop walks blobs/sha256/* in digest order, so which of the two prints first is luck — here the empty one did, which is why the secret shows up under the second FOUND IN line. The credential is plaintext in a layer that ships with the image, retrievable by anyone who can pull it — no exploit, no privilege, just tar.
Substitute your own digests:
tar -tvf blobs/sha256/fe77f750... # the layer that created the files
tar -tvf blobs/sha256/38df108f... # the layer that "deleted" them
0B in docker history. Is it empty?There it is, in plain sight: the rm layer contains two zero-byte files whose names begin with .wh.. That is what a delete is in an image. rm didn't produce a smaller image, it produced a slightly larger one — two extra tombstones stacked on top of everything they hide.
root/.wh..aws-credentials has two dots because the original filename already started with one: prefix .wh. plus .aws-credentials.
Write Dockerfile.fixed, moving the create-and-delete into a single RUN:
FROM alpine:3.20
RUN echo "build-id=1" > /etc/app-release
RUN dd if=/dev/urandom of=/opt/build-cache.bin bs=1M count=50 2>/dev/null \
&& echo "AKIAEXAMPLESECRETKEY" > /root/.aws-credentials \
&& rm -f /opt/build-cache.bin /root/.aws-credentials
CMD ["sleep", "3600"]
docker build -f Dockerfile.fixed -t layers-demo:squashed .
docker image inspect layers-demo:squashed --format '{{.Size}}'
#5 CACHED — the echo step is character-for-character the one :leaky already ran, so BuildKit did not run it again. Remember this; Part 3 turns on it.
:leaky — rm in its own layer | :squashed — one RUN | |
|---|---|---|
| Image size | 61,251,529 B (61.3 MB) | 8,822,708 B (8.82 MB) |
| Layers | 5 | 3 |
| 50 MB cache file on disk | yes, in layer 3 | no |
| Secret recoverable from image | yes | no |
Byte-identical container filesystems, 6.9× the size. The only difference is where the layer boundaries fell, and layer boundaries are the unit at which content becomes permanent.
8,822,708 is 8,822,697 + 11 + 0: the alpine rootfs, the app-release line, and a combined step whose net diff is nothing. Its docker history row reads 0B — the file it created never outlived the step, so not even a tombstone was needed.
What this part tests: the claim that a layer is named by its contents, so Docker stores one copy of a layer no matter how many images list it.
docker image inspect layers-demo:leaky --format '{{json .RootFS.Layers}}'
docker image inspect layers-demo:squashed --format '{{json .RootFS.Layers}}'
(One digest per line for readability — the command prints each image's list as a JSON array.)
Two identical strings. 88b4fba6… is the alpine rootfs, and you can prove that without leaving the shell — it is the only layer alpine:3.20 has:
docker image inspect alpine:3.20 --format '{{json .RootFS.Layers}}'
7b511a71… is the echo "build-id=1" layer. Hold on to the question of why it matches — Step 9 answers it, and the obvious answer is wrong.
docker build -t layers-demo:leaky . # unchanged, for contrast
sed -i '' 's/build-id=1/build-id=2/' Dockerfile
docker build --progress=plain -t layers-demo:rebuilt .
All three re-ran. The digests confirm it — only the base layer survives:
A layer's cache key includes the layer it was built on. Change one, and every layer above it is a different stack, so none of them can be reused. That's the reason COPY package.json comes before COPY . . in every well-written Node Dockerfile: put the thing that changes every commit as high in the stack as you can.
Back to Step 7: :leaky and :squashed agreed on 7b511a71…, the echo "build-id=1" layer. Force that step to run again — same base, same command, same resulting 11-byte file:
docker build --no-cache -f Dockerfile.fixed -t layers-demo:nocache .
docker image inspect layers-demo:squashed --format '{{json .RootFS.Layers}}'
docker image inspect layers-demo:nocache --format '{{json .RootFS.Layers}}'
The echo "build-id=1" layer is now a different layer. Same Dockerfile line, same base image, same 11 bytes of file content — different digest. docker save both images and list that one layer out of each to see the entire difference:
Two minutes of mtime, and tar -xO returns build-id=1 from both. A layer's digest is over its tar bytes, and a tar member carries its modification time, so re-running a step produces a layer that is content-identical and digest-different.
So Step 7's match was not two builds converging on the same bytes: it was BuildKit recognising (same parent, same command string) and reusing the already-committed layer without running anything — look back at Step 6's build, where BuildKit printed #5 … CACHED for exactly that line. That distinction is the whole practical difference between "Docker builds are reproducible" (they are not) and "Docker builds are cacheable" (they are). What is content-addressed all the way down, with no cache involved, is 88b4fba6…: every alpine-based image on your machine points at the one rootfs layer you pulled once.
You now have four images that between them advertise a lot of megabytes. How many of those bytes exist? Scope the question to your own images — a machine-wide total says nothing about this exercise:
docker system df -v | grep -E 'SHARED SIZE|^layers-demo'
:squashed reports 8.82 MB. How much disk does it actually occupy, given :leaky is already there?Read the :squashed row again: 8.82 MB of size, 0 B of unique size. Every byte that image needs was already on disk for :leaky. Building it cost nothing at all.
In exact bytes (from docker image inspect and the daemon's /system/df endpoint — the one-liner is under Go deeper):
reported SIZE | SHARED SIZE | UNIQUE SIZE | |
|---|---|---|---|
:leaky | 61,251,529 | 8,822,708 | 52,428,821 |
:squashed | 8,822,708 | 8,822,708 | 0 |
:rebuilt | 61,251,529 | 8,822,697 | 52,428,832 |
:nocache | 8,822,708 | 8,822,697 | 11 |
| sum | 140,148,474 | 35,290,810 | 104,857,664 |
The four images advertise 140,148,474 bytes. 35,290,810 of that is shared bytes, counted once into every image that names them — and only 8,822,708 distinct shared bytes exist on disk (the 8,822,697-byte alpine rootfs plus the 11-byte app-release layer that :leaky and :squashed agree on). Real occupancy is 104,857,664 + 8,822,708 = 113,680,372: 26,468,102 bytes of the headline number were never stored. Scale that to a fleet of fifty services on one base image and the sharing is the entire reason a registry is affordable.
What this part tests: that a running container adds only a diff. Per the mental model, the upperdir starts empty and gains one entry per file you touch — which is exactly the information docker diff reports.
docker run -d --name layers-box layers-demo:leaky sleep 3600
docker diff layers-box
docker diff report?A container that has done no writes has an empty writable layer — the process is running on a stack of read-only directories and a mount point.
docker exec layers-box sh -c '
echo "build-id=2" > /etc/app-release
mkdir -p /srv/data && echo hello > /srv/data/new.txt
rm /etc/motd'
docker diff layers-box
docker diff say about the directories containing them?Added, Changed, Deleted. Note /srv and /etc are C, not A — they already existed in the image; the writable layer had to materialize its own copy of each directory to hold the new entries. That's copy-up applied to directories.
docker ps -s --filter name=layers-box --format 'table {{.Names}}\t{{.Size}}'
17B is the writable layer — 11 for app-release plus 6 for new.txt; the tombstone for /etc/motd is free. virtual is that plus the shared image.
Start a second container and it costs 0B:
docker run -d --name layers-box2 layers-demo:leaky sleep 3600
docker exec layers-box2 cat /etc/app-release
docker ps -s --filter name=layers-box --format '{{.Names}} {{.Size}}'
Two containers reporting 61.3 MB each; 17 bytes of actual new disk between them. And layers-box2 still sees build-id=1 — the first container's edit lives in its upperdir, invisible to anyone else, because the layer they share is read-only for both.
docker exec layers-box2 sh -c 'ls -l /lib/libcrypto.so.3'
docker exec layers-box2 sh -c 'echo x >> /lib/libcrypto.so.3'
docker ps -s --filter name=layers-box2 --format '{{.Names}} {{.Size}}'
docker diff layers-box2
layers-box2 is currently at 0B. You are about to append two bytes to a 4.6 MB library that came from an image layer. What does it weigh afterwards?Two bytes written, 4.6 MB consumed. Copy-up has no notion of a partial file: to make one byte writable, overlayfs copies all 4,597,896 of them into the upper layer first.
This is the mechanism behind "why did my container balloon overnight" — a log rotation or an in-place edit of large image files, not new data. It's also why a database in a container wants a volume: a volume bypasses the union entirely.
What this part tests: everything above, at the level the kernel sees it. docker inspect will hand you the real paths.
docker inspect layers-box --format '{{json .GraphDriver}}'
LowerDir, given the image has five layers?(Pretty-printed — the command emits one line.) Six lower directories, topmost first: a per-container -init layer (where Docker stages /etc/hosts and friends), then your five image layers in reverse order. One upper. That colon-separated string is passed straight to mount -t overlay.
Now compare with the second container:
docker inspect layers-box2 --format '{{.GraphDriver.Data.LowerDir}}' | tr ':' '\n'
The five image directories are character-for-character the same paths; only the -init and upper differ. "Sharing a layer" means literally mounting the same directory into two containers.
ls /var/lib/docker from your own shell will fail — there is no such directory on the host. On native Linux, just sudo ls them and skip this wrapper. Everywhere else, reach into the VM's mount namespace:
docker run --rm --privileged --pid=host alpine:3.20 \
nsenter -t 1 -m -- <command>
--pid=host puts you in the VM's PID namespace so PID 1 is its init; nsenter -t 1 -m then enters that process's mount namespace, which is where /var/lib/docker lives. Substitute your own directory IDs from the docker inspect output — they are randomly generated per machine.
docker run --rm --privileged --pid=host alpine:3.20 nsenter -t 1 -m -- \
find /var/lib/docker/overlay2/1d5c8c44b19a8b…/diff -exec ls -ld {} +
docker diff reported six paths for layers-box, one of them D /etc/motd. What is physically there — and what stands in for the deleted file?Seven entries — the upper root, two directories it had to materialize, and four leaves — for a 61 MB filesystem. And look at /etc/motd: leading c, size 0, 0. That is a character device with major and minor both zero — exactly the on-disk whiteout the kernel documentation defines. Deleting a file added something. The D in docker diff is Docker translating this back into a word.
docker run --rm --privileged --pid=host alpine:3.20 nsenter -t 1 -m -- \
sh -c 'grep 1d5c8c44 /proc/mounts'
A plain overlay mount in /proc/mounts, indistinguishable from one you'd make by hand. Docker's whole "container filesystem" is this single line: six lowerdir= entries, one upperdir=, one workdir=.
The l/ paths are short symlinks Docker keeps "to avoid hitting the page size limitation on arguments to the mount command" — the same limit behind overlay2's documented ceiling of 128 lower layers.
docker run --rm --privileged --pid=host alpine:3.20 nsenter -t 1 -m -- sh -c \
'for d in s0boitxkt0lcv2ltxa1p6108u td38xshhvgkyrnryq0z1fhq8r \
uqvao75hp68davd9jea3taw7m bsf07qsb707txc2nz2x55y0h2; do
echo "=== $d ==="
find /var/lib/docker/overlay2/$d/diff -exec ls -ld {} +
done'
uqvao75hp6… is the dd layer, s0boitxkt0… the rm layer. Is the 50 MB file on your disk right now?(Every layer also carries the parent directories of the files it touched — that's why each one has a bare etc/.)
The rm layer is two character devices. The dd layer is all 52,428,800 bytes, sitting in a directory on your disk, under a path no container can see. And one command finishes the story:
docker run --rm --privileged --pid=host alpine:3.20 nsenter -t 1 -m -- \
cat /var/lib/docker/overlay2/td38xshhvgkyrnryq0z1fhq8r/diff/root/.aws-credentials
The same secret you pulled out of the tarball in Part 2, now read straight off the host filesystem, from an image whose every container reports the file as missing.
A docker history whose per-layer sizes sum to exactly the image size (8,822,697 + 11 + 52,428,800 + 21 + 0 = 61,251,529), with the RUN rm step contributing 0B. A container that agrees the deleted files are gone, and a docker save tarball that hands you AKIAEXAMPLESECRETKEY anyway, alongside two zero-byte .wh. tombstones. The same build with one && instead of three RUNs at 8,822,708 bytes — 6.9× smaller for identical behavior. Two images agreeing on their first two layer digests character-for-character, docker system df -v reporting :squashed at 8.82MB size and 0B unique size, and a one-character edit invalidating every layer above it. A --no-cache rebuild of that same RUN producing a different digest for an identical 11-byte file, which is how you learn the match was cache reuse rather than reproducibility. A running container whose writable layer is 17B (virtual 61.3MB), a second one at 0B, and a two-byte append that costs 4.6 MB. And finally a real overlay line in /proc/mounts with six lowerdirs, a character device at …/diff/etc/motd, and a 52,428,800-byte file alive in a layer directory that nothing can reach.
Because the layer is the unit of transfer, and immutability is what makes transfer cheap. If a layer could be edited, its digest would change, every image referencing it would need updating, and the "already have that one" check that makes docker pull fast would have nothing stable to compare. So a layer is frozen the moment it's written, named by its contents, and shared by anyone whose stack happens to contain the same bytes. Everything else follows from refusing to break that.
88b4fba6… is shared for the strong reason: it is the layer you pulled, and every alpine-based image on the machine names it. 7b511a71… is shared for a weaker reason: BuildKit saw a step it had already run on the same parent and reused the committed layer. Make that step actually execute again and the digest changes, because the tar records mtimes and two runs are never at the same instant. Content addressing gives you deduplication of bytes you already have; it does not give you reproducible builds, and Step 9 is the two-line proof.
Deletion is where the cost shows up. You cannot remove a file from a read-only layer, so the only honest thing an upper layer can do is record "stop looking below this path" — a whiteout. The union honors it, ls honors it, your application honors it. The registry does not, because the registry ships layers, not the union. RUN rm on a later line therefore buys you nothing but two tombstones, and this is not a Docker bug to be fixed; it is the direct price of the property that makes images shareable at all. The fix is always to arrange for the bytes never to be committed to a layer in the first place — one RUN, a multi-stage build, or a build mount.
Copy-up is the same trade in the other direction. Making an image layer writable per-container would mean copying it per-container, which would undo the sharing. So the layer stays read-only and the copy happens lazily, per file, on first write — near-zero cost for a container that mostly reads, and a full file copy the instant it isn't. 17B (virtual 61.3MB) and 4.6MB for two bytes are the two ends of that one mechanism.
Where the effect vanishes. All of this is a property of the union, not of containers. Mount a volume or a bind mount over a path and that subtree is no longer part of the overlay: no copy-up, no whiteouts, no contribution to docker diff, and no growth in the writable layer no matter how much you write. That is why the copy-up surprise never bites a database that keeps its data directory on a volume — and always bites one that doesn't.
:leaky as a multi-stage build — do the dd and the credentials work in a FROM alpine AS build stage, then FROM alpine and COPY --from=build only what you want. Check RootFS.Layers: the discarded stage contributes no layers at all, because it was never part of the final image's stack. This is the actual answer to Part 2's problem.RUN --mount=type=secret,id=creds cat /run/secrets/creds with docker build --secret id=creds,src=./creds. The file is present during the step and absent from the layer — verify with the Part 2 tarball scan and confirm nothing matches.WORKDIR, ENV, LABEL and EXPOSE lines and re-read docker history. All 0B: they're recorded in the image config (docker inspect --format '{{json .Config}}'), which is itself a blob in the tarball. The config plus the ordered layer list is the entire image — there is no other file.-v volume from inside layers-box and re-run docker diff. It doesn't appear, because a volume is a bind mount over the union, not part of it — which is the whole reason volume data survives docker rm.sock=$(docker context inspect --format '{{.Endpoints.docker.Host}}' | sed 's|unix://||')
curl -s --unix-socket "$sock" http://localhost/v1.45/system/df | python3 -c '
import json, sys
for i in json.load(sys.stdin)["Images"]:
for t in i.get("RepoTags") or []:
if t.startswith("layers-demo"):
print(t, i["Size"], i["SharedSize"], i["Size"] - i["SharedSize"])'
Sources: Docker Docs: Storage drivers · Docker Docs: OverlayFS storage driver · Linux kernel: Overlay Filesystem — its "whiteouts and opaque directories" section defines the 0,0 character device you found · OCI Image Layer Specification for the .wh. tar convention
docker system prune and friends would take other people's images and containers with them. Remove only what this exercise created.
docker rm -f layers-box layers-box2
docker rmi layers-demo:leaky layers-demo:squashed layers-demo:rebuilt layers-demo:nocache
rm -rf /tmp/layers
The build cache outlives the images. Drop just this exercise's entries — the description filter keeps everyone else's cache intact:
for pat in build-id build-cache aws-credentials app-release; do
docker buildx prune -a --force --filter "description~=$pat"
done
Run it twice, for the same reason as in Setup, then confirm nothing of yours is left and everyone else's cache still is:
docker buildx du --verbose --filter 'description~=build-cache' | grep -c '^ID:' # → 0
docker buildx du | tail -2